46 

kiki does serious times

September 16th, 2008

Let me start this post off by saying … DEAR GOD WHAT A DEPRESSING WEEKEND. Not only am I literally suffering some sort of haemorrhagic disease, but my Dragons lost terribly AND there’s another sex scandal to deal with. I MEAN REALLY.

I am seriously in the grips of some sort of crazy Outbreak shit. There has been actual blood vomiting and I’m positive only 35% of it was caused by tequila. Is it Ebola? Crimean-Congo Fever? IS IT DENGUE? So many questions. If I caught something from that pet monkey Lachie had in here last week I am deadset going to throttle him.

haojodf
the scene outside the Errol office disturbed the neighbours

I’ve been feeling like the walking dead since Thursday and I am very very proud of myself for not vomming all over Stephen Ferris during our appearance on Fire Up. Mostly because no one would ever believe I was vomiting for a legitmate non-alcohol related reason. Because I am basically a man I have been in total SHE’LL BE RIGHT mode but this afternoon Intern John-John is driving me to the doctors to see what’s up. He’s even promised to put pants on! Usually Intern Brownie looks after the serious adulty things, but he’s still dosed up on Xanax after the Dragons loss and isn’t allowed to drive.

klfjf

Now you all have a comprehensive update on my health, let’s talk about the bloody Broncos. Another day, another scandal. Has this deadset been the Worst Year Ever or what? Here we are, supposed to be celebrating the centenary of our illustrious game and instead it’s been all international manhunts, glassing people in the face and yucky times in nightclub toilets. And that’s just the tip of the iceberg. I could detail all of 2008′s dramaz … but I would be here so long my ass might fuse to the chair like those fatties that can’t move off their lounge coz of said fatness.

And ain’t that a pretty mental image?

To be honest, this year has been bloody exhausting. I am so emotionally drained from constantly having to defend the game I love. And yes, as a woman I am constantly called upon to not only defend the game of rugby league, but my dedication to it. I find it intensely annoying but I understand why people ask Those Sort of Questions.

I just wish it wasn’t an issue.  I resent that this sorta stuff even exists.

I truly hate being serious and addressing issues that aren’t the changing lengths of Hot Bitch Cooper’s rats tail (btw he totally trimmed it during the week). I have managed to get through all of 2008 skilfully avoiding the heavy stuff but now I feel like I have to say something.

okjfkfj

So take notes children, because this is my Definitive Manifesto. Next time someone asks me the dreaded ‘but but…you’re a league fan AND a woman….how do you feel about…??’ I am directing them here.

1) As far as most rugby league scandals that crop up, like drinking, (legal) shagging, pissing in public and being obnoxious, I honestly don’t believe footy players are any worse behaved than alot of guys their own age. If my mates had the stuff they did on the weekends reported in the papers, they would be in the same position. Young Australian men do stupid shit. It’s a fact of life. I mean who hasn’t peed in an alley when drunk?

2) But let me be clear, I do not, nor does anyone at Errol condone illegal or anti-social behaviour. We are not apologists. There is absolutely no excuse for violence, sexual assault or drink driving.

3) We do however take objection to people inferring that this sort of stuff is representative of rugby league. Because it isn’t. These are social problems, not footy problems.

4) Being a league fan certainly does not mean we approve of any of this behaviour. Stop assuming it is. We don’t particularly like having our morals or our commitment to feminism being questioned coz coz … omgz how can you be a woman and like league and omg omg WHAT ABOUT THE SISTERHOOD? Being a dedicated league fan doesn’t make me less of a woman, and being a woman doesn’t make me any less of a league fan.

We believe men and women have every right to their choices and to respect from their own and the opposite sex.  Watching men throw a football around doesn’t change that in any way, so please do shut up. Thankyou kindly.

5) Stop asking me if I think league is disrespectful to women. For the record, my answer is no. I don’t think league as a game, or its fans, are deliberately or inherently disrespectful to women.  Is there sexism or discrimination?  We’re sure there is, just as – sadly – there is in every walk of life.

Is there ignorance? You bet your ass there is. I think this is for a couple of reasons -

a) League is almost entirely male dominated. If anyone is disrespectful to women it’s probably because they don’t SEE any women in an everyday context. Sure there might be a receptionist and a physio here and there, but basically its men men men all the time.  Most players join clubs from a very young age and they basically grow up in this manufactured environment. If some of them end up having slightly skewed views on women, it’s hardly a suprise.

b) Without this every day interaction with women, the boys are left with very little to go on. To be frank, if I was 20 year old guy and offered sex on a platter every time I went out, I would probably come to think that the only way men and women interact is sexual, too.

Thankfully, we think the NRL is trying to change things. I think they really do want to involve women, but they are just at a bit of a loss as how to do it. 

God knows there are enough women who are rugby league fans.  Even though the boys who play footy might live in a bubble of testosterone, one look around the field at any footy game will show you that there are plennnty of women in league.

So we would like to help you out with a simple step-by-step guide to diversifying league: Step 1 – hire us.  Step 2 to 100 – watch our awesome ideas flourish.

One more thing. Because people ask us this all the time:

No, we are not trying to shag footy players. We are NOT footy groupies. Although we may sexually objectify them alot on Errol (it’s fun okay?) that doesn’t mean we want them to put their penis in us. We love the boys and we love the game … but that’s as far as it goes.

The next person that asks The Sex Question … well … do so at your own peril. You have been Warned.

And that’s it really. God, being serious is GROSS, I feel a bit dirty.

If you want to discuss serious times any further, leave us a comment.

  • http://www.oherrol.com sassy

    re footy players (like young guys in general) often doing stupid shit -

    also footy players, like people in general, are sometimes just dickheads.

    true story.

  • http://www.oherrol.com lozzy

    bahah omg for a serious post i lol’d like woah at that first pic

  • Kiki

    lolz sassy like the simpsons…some elephants are just jerks.

    i loled when i found it lozzy dont worry.

  • Ray

    Beautifully expressed, Kiki. Serious times suits you. Even though I’m out of the League closet now, my dad brought me up with Union and I have spent my entire life defending the game and my love for it. Union players do really stupid shit too. I agree, it gets exhausting. My only saving grace over here has been that football (soccer) is so scandalous that it’s sometimes overshadowed the wrong-doings in rugby.

    And a message to the old cigar smoking men who told me I was only at the Cardiff matches to perv at the players: Wrong. Being a woman just makes the view slightly nicer. My female status does not impact upon my ability to understand the rules of the game.

    Sidenote: I never thought I would see the Welsh language in use on Errol. How on earth did you find a copy of the Communist manifesto in WELSH?

    Brysia i wella! (Welsh Translation: Get well soon!)

  • http://www.thisismodern.wordpress.com James

    I’m not sure if the NRL already has them, but one or two female executives at boadroom level and some respectable female commentators (who have a passion for the game, not just as eye-candy) would sort out that image problem.

    It helped the AFL’s image a lot. And look how much trouble AFL players get into. Women love the game just as much as men. Because the AFL have made concerted efforts to appeal to women and children in the past decade.

    I refer you to Channel Ten’s “Before the Game” program which pretty much has the effect of presenting the AFL brand as an irresistable mixture of Disney, Funtastic and Pets Paradise, making it appealing to kids and parents every Saturday night at 6.30pm.

    Just as long as they don’t put Anh Do on a League version it would probably do wonders also.

    Anyway, something to mull over I guess. Girl power!

    Now I’m off to Europe, ciao ciao x

  • Marlo

    havent read your whole comment yet, but James have you heard of a brilliant woman called Kaye Page? She was the first woman to be elected to the board and she is as passionate as these girls who write here. She was also the brainchild behind domayne, which has been a huge success for the Harvey Norman chain- so dont underestimate the power of women in Rugby league. if they were given half a bloody chance, then yes. youre right they could make a difference. but at the end of the day (its a game of two halves etc.) its a mans world, and thats going to be hard to overcome.

  • Kiki

    JAMES

    GET UR AFL PROPAGANDA OFF ERROL K THANKS

    but girl power…heart.

    ray i didnt even realise it was welsh! i just google imaged manifesto and found it. ah welsh..so many consonants.

  • marlo

    Also- I love AFL (probs more than NRL; dont shoot me) but I dont like it because of some patronising, pre game panel. I love it because Ive grown up on it. Its like vegemite.

  • Hazy

    For sure there are hotties galore in the NRL and personally, i talk about them before the game but as soon as it starts, it’s all about the game. So many guys don’t get it and think i have no idea about the game and it really is annoying.
    Where i sit at games (reserved seat)is pretty much all women and families and they are all into the game as well. we’re out there, we just need a voice!

    p.s. i love AFL too. please don’t hate me….

  • Marlo

    we are allowed to love AFL, we just arent allowed to talk about it on here hehe

  • Kiki

    oh yes. u can like AFL. just never mention it in my presence. that goes for any other code too.

  • unhappy bart

    Serious times. I don’t know what to think at the moment tbh. But can’t help but make a serious comment I guess :(

    I just wish some of the footy players weren’t so incredibly DUMB to put themselves in positions that can only reflect badly on them, and the game that I grew up loving.

    Despite them being just regular young guys and all that, I kind of wish the other regular young guys that play but don’t put themselves in these dumb scenarios would stand up to the clowns that do a little bit more? Just for the sake of their team, and for the sake of the game and sponsorship/fans etc that pay them quite generously to make their living…

    I was so excited by the finals after Sunday night’s fantastic game and result, and now to be honest I find myself not caring so much? All because of some really DUMB guys who (perhaps like wider society too, but still) think mainly with their dicks… and think they have some god-given right to jump 40min taxi queues as well!

  • Ray

    Soz, K. I’ll make my comments a Union-free-zone from now on. League only from here on in.

  • Miss Bree

    the broncos are my team, and i am not having a say on the incidents, coz matter of factly, i am not making a comment until the investigation is complete…

    but from the reports one of my best friends turned around and went “well maybe its a reflection on my freinds, but majority of them would have been in a similar sexual encounter..” people are carrying on as if its only footy players who do this kind of thing… truth is, it isn’t… they just cop the slack because oh look at that people know their names… If it was anyone else, it wouldn’t seriously be in the paper until the investigation was over and the details were released…

    (JUST MAKING IT CLEAR THAT I AM STATING THE ABOVE ASSUMING INNOCENCE UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY…)

  • Kiki

    hahahah Ray no its okay i was kidding. kind of. i just have an irrational hatred of any code that isnt league and i get really pissy if people talk about it around me. im a league facist…WHEEE!

    and yes bree ur right, group sex is a fairly commonplace things these days. OR SO I’VE HEARD.

    Bart u seem more upset than me! im not upset, im just annoyed i keep having to defend league to people.

  • Marlo

    To be perfectly honest, I dont even know how much of it is a male thing. Maybe its just me, but if I were in their position Id probably be doing the same thing; even as a girl. I wouldnt (allegedly) sexually assault anyone though obviously because thats just not on- no matter who you are.

  • bart

    Yeah, I’m a bit down about it K…. Maybe it’s one too many incidents for me where liberties have been alleged to have been taken by groups of guys/footy players in their interactions with women?

    If it’s ALL consensual then yeah sure that’s cool… and yes, innocent until proven guilty and all that. But as a guy – and a footy fan – I just hate how situations like this inevitably make the wider population think worse of footy, and of men/footy players.

    Especially when it all seems so avoidable if only the dumb men/players concerned take some responsibility in the first place, you know?

    No-one is the winner here, lads… we all suffer (the game, fans, your club, team mates, yourselves, the others involved) because of your choices for how/where/when you want to get your thrills!

    Maybe it’s a reflection on the people I’ve hung around and are friends with, but stuff like this would be enough for a guy’s mates to intervene, pull him aside and make sure he at least stops acting like a tool in public. *shrugs*

  • bart

    *deep breath*

    It’s OK, I think I’m alright now?

    I found a Coolio song that has helped me put it all in perspective… and move on (at least until the next dumb incident surfaces)!

  • http://www.oherrol.com sassy

    ok so we now know for sure it was boyd k hunt and thaiday and one other mystery bronco who were involved in whatever it was that happened. dammit.

    THAIDAY! I GAVE YOU A MEN WE LOVE POST!

    I can’t believe the only bronco I didn’t hate repaid my love by getting involved in a nightclub toilet scandal. THAT IS SO CLICHE AND TACKY THAIDAY.

    I don’t like it at all.

  • Josh

    I hate defending league, but I am proud of my sport, proud of my club, no matter what happens.

    Kiki; the thing I really like about your post is that you have said things people have wanted to say, but the way you have said it is the exact same words people have been missing when they defend our sport. You couldn’t have done it more spot on.

  • Kiki

    aw thankyou joshie!

    oh god i cant believe it was thaiday. i am literally in shock. but but…hes so…benevolent.

    in defence of the players though, if Normal Guys were being offered blow jobs in nightclub toilets you know most of them would take it. the end.

  • http://www.oherrol.com sassy

    not just would say yes to it … they do say yes. it happens all the time.

    I hate thaiday being involved in a scandal at all, but if it turns out it was assault too I will be so rageful and disappointed. UNACCEPTABLE THAIDAY.

  • Jade

    I just wanna know how three men of that size plus a girl fit into a toilet cubicle? How there was any room for sexytimes is beyond me.

    I like it when you’re serious Kiki!

  • http://www.oherrol.com sassy

    jade – always thinking about logistics!

    disabled cubicle?

  • Kiki

    yes it was the disabled cubicle in the mens toilets. CLASSSSS.

    sassy i think they will be cleared of serious sexual assault.

    the goss is that one of them got out their mobile phones. they like to treasure these special memories obviously. maybe for this years christmas cards?

    ALLEGEDLY.

    i guess it will all come out.

    really i just hope darius boyd is innocent coz godmanit WE REALLY NEED A CENTRE NEXT YEAR.

  • Adikkal

    Imagine if as they left there was a guy in a wheelchair waiting to use the toilet…

    Now *that* would be scandalous

  • http://www.oherrol.com sassy

    well whatever happened I’m already too grossed out to love thaiday anymore. I think group sex involving k hunt is a dealbreaker. SOZ SAM.

    meanwhile they didn’t have mobile phone cameras back when I studied the crimes act so I have no idea what implications the photos have. I AM SO OLD.

  • http://www.oherrol.com lozzy

    bahah jade. my mum said WHAT WAS A GIRL DOING IN THE BOYS TOILETS ANYWAY? oh mum.

    ps i KNEW i didn’t like thaiday! i’m always right bbs. you can’t fight my instincts.

  • http://www.oherrol.com sassy

    on a related note to the Broncos Issewe I would like to know what they were doing out drinking anyway. YOU HAVE A GAME ON FRIDAY. you should have been at home drinking your powerades and having radox baths or whatever athletes do. if I were uncle wayne I would not be pleased at all.

  • Kiki

    bahaha adge. EXTRA EXTRA! BRONCOS DISREGARD THE DISABLED!

    that happened to me at the races one time. except it was a woman. a very very angry woman. im sorry lady but i was about to pee my pants and it was for the public good that i used your special toilet. im sorrrrry.

  • Lessie League Lover

    I’m a Lesbian who Loves League (strange fascination) and union AND I don’t even mind a spot of AFL.
    Who knows where this desire has come from?
    What I DO know is that I think a game without a decent dacking is no game at all. And I also love the man-on-man love opportunities that boy only sports create.
    Like when some one scores and all the boys rush in to hug each other.
    I also think of all the dumb fun stuff I’ve done, and thank the non-existent lord I’m not in the public eye.

  • http://www.oherrol.com sassy

    I’m sorry to drag on these comments kids, but considering that the allegations against the boys are criminal, does it seem ridiculous to anyone that they are still in the named side after sleeping in was enough to give thaiday the boot before?

    or that the queensland police minister is giving public statements to support the team when surely she shouldn’t be giving them one way of the other?

    I’m starting to feel a bit outragey. I think it only makes the whole situation worse to deal with problems in a way that appears to be biased, even if that’s not necessarily true; it undermines the credibility of whatever the result ends up being.

  • bart

    I think some of the questions and issues in the comments since my ones last night probably sum up where my head was at with it, as the details kept coming through. Each little snipped was its own outrage of some level – at that’s without even knowing conclusively about the consent side of the equation.

    But (as I must keep reminding myself) I have found solace in a Coolio song, and so am (hopefully) not going to think about these vile creatures any longer… *lalalalala*.

    Maybe I am a little prudish(!), but I’d like to think that most “normal guys” wouldn’t take up the offer of blow-jobs in nightclub toilets? Especially together or in threes, and especially if there was no rinsing, mouthwash or cleaning of teeth involved at set intervals… ew. The footy guys can have their celebrated “teamwork” to themselves imo.

  • Kiki

    yes you are prudish bart. for a man anyway!

    LESSIE LEAGUE LOVER! Lesbian Bec has competition now. the manlove is probably my favourite part of league too. that and the violence.

  • http://www.oherrol.com lozzy

    well this is why i never leave the house without my utility belt full of Colgate products.

  • bart

    lol @ Loz.

    I can picture it now, Tomb raider style.

  • Jessica

    Yeah, i’m not really outraged by this particular incident at all. If a chick willingly goes along with three men to have sex with them then she is partly responsible for what might happen – good or bad. It’s unfair to consent and then in the middle of it all just withdraw consent. Maybe if alcohol wasnt involved it would be different, but alcohol impairs judgement. So basically: too fucking bad for her.

    I think the use of the term “sexual assault” is bullshit and does a disservice to women (and men) who actually were sexually assaulted. Ones who didn’t at any point consent. Date rape is such a grey area. A lot of date rape can stem from simple misunderstandings influenced by alcohol.

    I think it would be fucking disgusting and a complete perversion of justice to see three players be branded rapists over an incident like this. That’s if what’s come out is the actual truth.

    But should they get away with having public group sex in a nightclub toilet? Hell fucking no. But that should be handled by their club or by the NRL. And if they are found guilty of other criminal acts then they should be punished the way any other person would be. No more or no less. Clubs should do everything in their power to discourage this sort of behaviour because let’s face it, it makes Rugby League look shit and unsupportable.

    I’m tired of seeing the pendulum swing so extremely. From blaming the women without question to now blaming the players without question. It’s ridiculous and neither parties should take advantage of it when it swings in their direction. The truth must be honoured. Some fucking ownership over actions wouldnt go astray.

  • http://www.oherrol.com sassy

    jessica I couldn’t disagree with you more about this. responsibility or obligations don’t change based on whether it’s ‘date rape’ or what you see as Proper Sexual Assault.

    even if you can say a woman’s actions put her in a situation where rape was more likely, you can just as easily say that a man under the influence of alcohol drank himself to that point, so whatever he did or didn’t do afterwards – even if it was due to ‘a misunderstanding’ – is still his responsibility.

    the only difference as I see it in cases where someone changes their mind or gives limited consent is that there is a much better chance to reduce the instances of it happening again. it’s not less unacceptable, but if you accept that there IS occasionally some confusion about what is and isn’t ok, then you also admit there is a chance that education will make a difference.

    yes ‘date rape’ or consent can be confusing, but maybe that means that the nrl in particular should take the opportunity they have to educate players (like michael hall wrote in the tele) … I won’t accept that it’s a justification for us all to say OH IT’S TOO HARD and forget about it.

  • Bec

    I may come off like a feminist lesbian here, but i also disagree with you Jessica. We don’t actually know what the details are – but what if she agreed to perform oral sex on all three of them? That’s her right. What if after that they decided she should have sex with them, and she didn’t want to go that far? You can’t just say ‘well, she went in there with them and they were drunk’ so that absolves them of all responsibility. Or, what if she agreed to sex with them – and then one pulled out his mobile phone and started recording it, which she objected to and demanded that they stop, and they wouldn’t. Because she started it, she has no right to change her mind even after something she didn’t consent to came into play?

    I think your argument goes too far the other way. it’s ‘unfair’ to give consent and then withdraw consent halfway through? I think that’s a difficult argument to try and make. Which point do you think someone should be allowed to withdraw consent? When she goes into the bedroom with a guy? When they lie down? When they make out? When he gets an erection or she lets him touch her breasts? Where is the line drawn? Or, if she agrees initially to having sex with him, there is no point as to where she can change her mind? If he’s drunk, and he gets the impression she has said yes to sex, and goes ahead as she is protesting, that’s not real sexual assault?

  • http://www.oherrol.com sassy

    you are a feminist lesbian! and that’s why I love you.

  • Kiki

    ALL THIS SERIOUS

    IM BREAKING OUT INTO HIVES

  • bart

    That Michael Hall article was a good one. The game (as employer) has a duty of care to its players, that should extend beyond just the playing bits of their employment – especially where the behaviour ends up having a detrimental effect on the game (in terms of image, sponsorship and community support.

    Trouble is that up until now the NRL have said the clubs are each responsible for that. And the current Broncos stuff pretty much shows that no club is really up to it by themselves, it has to come from the top, for the benefits to really come.

  • Marlo

    Jessica, I love you…but it worries me that, especially as a woman, you think the bigger issue is the public sex and not the (alleged) sexual assault.

  • Jessica

    You’re right. The truth is we don’t really know what happened. So it’s all speculation right now. And i’m pretty sure both parties are exaggerating to suit themselves. I think if force was used in order for them to continue having sex (physical, intimidation) with her after she made it clear that she didnt want to continue having sex then yeah, that’s rape. But (innocent) misunderstandings do happen when sex and alcohol are combined and if someone was to take advantage of the individual factors to cry rape then that’s shameful.

    I’m just tired of all this bullshit. I’m tired of women thinking they don’t have any personal responsibility in all of this. The most empowering thing a woman can do for herself is to not be a fucking dickhead. The world is a dangerous place, rape is hard to prove, why the fuck would anyone in their right mind put themselves in such a position in the first place? Does that mean it’s ‘all her fault’? Well, no. It’s not even about blaming the victim or anything as retarded as that, i think the issues should be kept separate. The players are responsible for their own actions. If it turns out they did use force or intimidation to continue then i would hope they’d be punished appropriately for it. They should be reprimanded even if they didn’t rape her because i’m sorry, call me a prude, but group sex in a public toilet is not on and shouldn’t be encouraged.

    I’m a feminist and i’m proud of it but i really don’t see what feminism has to do with any of this to be quite honest. I just expect more from women. And to be honest i expected more from those players. All that money to help educate them just so they can have sex in toilets? What a fucking joke.

    At the end of the day it’s innocent until proven guilty and i think that’s fair enough. For now i’m sticking with judging them harshly on their choice to have sex in public.

  • Marlo

    But if a woman wants to have sex with 3 guys that should be her choice…if she decides to and then sees they all have warts on their cocks (this is hypothetical obviously,) then she should be able to withdraw her consent. I see what you are saying about putting yourself in a situation, but hey, someone could have been in a gang bang with one girl and 58 guys in the middle of a shopping centre and everything went smoothly (eeew) and that same girl could then be raped by one person in her own home. Its all circumstantial and I dont think putting yourself in a situation has anything to do with it when you factor in that each individual sexual assault case is different.

  • http://www.oherrol.com sassy

    I think the question of the dumb situations people put themselves in and the question of sexual assault and personal responsibility are completely different. but I do understand you a little bit more clearly now jessica.

    it’s equivalent to the difference between football players getting blind in public places and putting themselves AT RISK of doing stupid things, bringing the club into disrepute, raising their chances of being involved in something criminal or unsavoury … and the issue of IF they did sexually assault someone.

    even if they didn’t sexually assault anyone, they are still idiots for putting themselves in the situation they did and they should have known better.

    whether or not it’s right, or ideal, it’s still always a good idea for people to be careful – you should be able to rely on other people to do the right thing, but you can’t. and that applies to both sexes, I don’t expect women to be smarter or more cautious just by virtue of being women.

    I do think you make a distinction that doesn’t exist though between ‘misunderstandings’ and ‘force’ – assuming the other person doesn’t want to continue, then to go on is force, regardless of whether they are consciously coercing someone or coercing them through ignorance or delusion or blissful unawareness. and I guess that’s where the michael hall ‘learn about ladies’ classes come in.